How are doubts in the interpretation of the labor code supposed to be resolved?

The resolution of doubts in the interpretation of the labor code is guided by the principle of protecting the rights and interests of workers. Therefore, when ambiguities or uncertainties arise regarding the provisions of the labor code, these doubts are generally resolved in favor of labor. This approach reflects a fundamental commitment to ensuring fair treatment of employees, acknowledging the power imbalance that often exists between employers and employees.

This principle is rooted in labor law and the philosophy that workers, being the more vulnerable party in the employer-employee relationship, should be afforded the benefit of the doubt when conflicts or interpretations arise. It is intended to promote and safeguard workers' rights, thereby fostering a more equitable workplace environment.

The other options do not align with this protective principle. For instance, favoring management could exacerbate inequalities between employers and employees, while an equal approach might fail to adequately address the inherent vulnerabilities of workers. Relying solely on external consultants might not consider the specific context of the labor relationship and may not uphold the necessary protections intended for workers under the law.