Which performance appraisal method allows for individual comparisons based on a detailed job analysis?

The Manning Comparison Method is designed to provide comparative evaluations of employees based on a specific analysis of job requirements and performance criteria. This method relies heavily on detailed job analysis to ensure that the comparisons made are relevant and aligned with the actual demands of the job.

By using a thorough job analysis, the Manning Comparison Method establishes clear benchmarks that allow for effective performance evaluations. This enables managers to identify how each employee measures up against the defined standards, facilitating a structured approach to performance management. The detailed nature of this method helps to mitigate biases and allows for a more systematic and objective assessment of employees.

In contrast, the Graphic Rating Scale Method is more straightforward but may not take detailed job analysis into account as comprehensively. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales focus on specific behaviors rather than comparisons of individuals. Management by Objective emphasizes goal-setting and achievement, which can vary across different roles, making it less about individual comparison based on job analysis. Thus, the Manning Comparison Method stands out as the one specifically tailored for detailed job comparisons.